
If we're going to use the eye, we might as well misuse it:
...through a paranoiac and active process of thought, it will be possible (simultaneously with automatism and other passive states) to systemize confusion and to contribute to the total discrediting of the world of reality.
(Dalí, "Nouvelles Considérations Génénerales sur le Mécanisme du Phénomène Paranoïaque du Point du Vue Surréaliste," my translation)
The process is simple. One stares at something until one sees something new emerge. A formation of rocks becomes a soldier's head; a light-bulb becomes a glowing fist; or like the famous Michelangelo example, the cracks in the wall form the outline of a new continent.
As annoying as Dalí can be, the articulation of the paranoiac-critical method was a valuable contribution to surrealism. The act of seeing becomes an act of revision, a manipulation of sense data. Some say it is merely an extension of Ernst's frottage, nonetheless, Dalí's critical paranoia puts this new kind of seeing in the realm of everyday experience and banal imagery.
The paranoiac-critical method works in language, too: In the word
scissors I find "the science of swords." In
inquiry I hear "the choir requires ink."
Irrigate "opens on an iris."
Another can only be "otters in the ether."